I was on the road driving home and this midsize pickup truck was in front of me. It had a flair chrome tailpipe that was aftermarket sticking out of the right side of the truck. I’ve seen the same type of pipe on the back of these small noncommercial trucks sticking straight out of the bed before. When the man driving hit the gas, black smoke poured out like water from a pitcher. I tried to get away from him. I backed off and slowed down. I turned down another road and took a bit of a detour. As I came up to the road that I needed to turn on, there he was again right in front of me. He was driving up a small incline now and the smoke billowed out of the truck. His windows were open and all the fresh beautiful of the day was in his face. The dark black soot was behind him for the rest of us.
I asked my wife what I should do. Should I just slow down more? Is he going to stay on the road I am on? I only have one way to get where I going, will he be on here for the whole ride? I slowed again and waited for him to get far enough away and the wind to carry the smoke. I turned down my road and went about my day from there.
Rights and Privileges
The man in the truck didn’t even know I exist. There would be no negotiation with him either. He decided when he bought and/pr configured his truck that he was going to what he wanted for whatever his purpose. In his mind, he had the right to do what he wanted to do. He has the ability for sure, but does he have the right? What is the right?
It gave me pause; it made me think about the world. This moment and simple act of driving which in the US is NOT a right but a privilege. It sort of boggled my mind. If I have the right to buy or build many dangerous things but the privilege to use it, wouldn’t that be confusing? I think many people confuse right and privilege.
Many people in the world are now seemingly confused by what they think they have as “rights” and they take action which is uncaring and harmful to others. Instead of working towards the greater good, we are evolving in our selfishness.
I don’t want to pretend that we didn’t have selfish people throughout all history. I think the difference is the visibility. For example, Thomas Midgley Jr. the man behind leaded gasoline literally lowered the IQ of the entire planet. He also developed chemicals that depleted the ozone layer. His inventions were the most destructive in recent human history. Back then, there were no blogs or videos. No social media, no collaborative collected network of people and science. No one stopped him until it was too late. The damage was done. We have many references in history of people unable or unwilling to do something to stop the damage to our world. The difference is they were most alone.
We are together. We have today many world leaders sitting in the front seat of their version of the pickup truck spewing and poisoning everything they leave behind them. The rest of us are trying to find ways around it, we are trying to find other ways home. We have slowed down. We didn’t and don’t want to confront them because they have a right to do what they are doing. They have the right?
When Individual “Freedom” Becomes Collective Tyranny
They have the right?
No. They absolutely do not.

Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins. We’ve created a culture where people believe their “rights” extend far beyond their personal sphere, into our shared air, our collective future, our children’s lungs. It is beyond the idea of American freedom or an American culture. I simply can’t process how we as a body of people with our collective intelligence allow for this behavior to continue. Take the black smoke and soot and apply it to whatever situation you believe it fits.
This isn’t about one guy with a modified exhaust. This is about a systematic confusion between choice and moral license. Yes, you can buy that chrome tailpipe. Yes, you can modify your truck. But the moment your choices poison the air I breathe, damage the climate my grandchildren will inherit, your “right” becomes my oppression.
We’ve built an economy that profits from this confusion. If we continue with the analogy, the aftermarket exhaust industry thrives on selling “freedom” and “power” while externalizing the true costs to society. The truck driver pays $500 for his chrome pipe; we all pay the price in healthcare costs, environmental degradation, and diminished quality of life.
The Visibility Paradox
You’re right about visibility being the game-changer. Thomas Midgley Jr. operated in shadows—corporate boardrooms, private labs, industry conferences. Today’s environmental destroyers operate in broad daylight, often live streaming their damage on social media.
But here’s the paradox: visibility without accountability is just performance.
That driver knows his smoke is visible. He probably enjoys it. The “rolling coal” phenomenon isn’t ignorance’s deliberate environmental aggression, a middle finger to anyone who cares about clean air. It’s weaponized selfishness.
The Leadership Crisis
My metaphor about world leaders in their pickup trucks is devastatingly accurate. From politicians who gut environmental regulations to CEO’s who prioritize quarterly profits over planetary survival, we’re witnessing leadership that has confused power with right.
They don’t have the right to destroy our future. They have the power to do so, and they’ve convinced themselves and too many of us that power equals permission. I have seen staunch public figures change their positions on recent events and raise their voices but doesn’t seem to be enough. I suppose it would be as if I stuck my hand out of the window and yelled “asshole.”
The Collective Response Imperative
So, what do we do when individual “rights” threaten collective survival?
- First, we stop being polite about it. Human destruction isn’t a difference of opinion; it’s violence against the commons. We need to call it out for what it is.
- Second, we make the costs visible and immediate. The people exhibiting bad behavior like truck driver should face real consequences: fines, license suspension, mandatory emissions testing. His “right” to pollute should cost him more than our right to breathe clean air costs us.
- Third, we organize around shared vulnerability. Our collective interest in survival trumps anyone’s individual interest in pollution.
The Choice Before Us
We’re at an inflection point. We can continue taking detours, slowing down, finding alternate routes around the damage others create. Or we can recognize that our right to a livable planet supersedes anyone’s claimed right to destroy it.
The truck driver (Society) doesn’t know you exist? Make yourself known. Vote for leaders who understand that the basic function of a society is that it wants and needs to survive.
The question isn’t whether they have the right to poison our future. The question is whether we have the courage to stop them.
Because here’s the truth that cuts through all the philosophical debate about rights and privileges: There is no right to destroy the only planet we have.
And if we keep treating destruction as a legitimate expression of individual freedom, we’ll discover too late that we’ve confused liberty with collective suicide.
The smoke is real. The damage is real. The choice is ours.
Howie, I was unable to post this on your blog. Very good posting this week!!
The paradox is even greater, in that many want less government but at the same time how do we get the collective citizens to adhere to do the right thing by our planet or for each other. During the industrial revolution we had to come up with laws to protect us from monopolies and we had the gilded age which is coming full circle today. Yes, I agree that there is a difference between privilege and rights, just as there is a difference in freedom and sacrifice. We don’t have freedom without sacrifice and what are we sacrificing? Is it not our own selfishness? This is an eternal struggle for us humans and until we transform into a better image of ourselves we will continue to walk this path of selfishness to our own demise. The image is basically the difference in looking at all things…it isn’t either or, but either…and. To many times we seek resolution at conflict with a binary answer, when we should be seeking an inclusive answer. Maybe we need to change our binary politics to include more parties that will give coalition instead of either or solutions.
Shalom R