It is estimated that the number of mobile phone users in the world is expected to pass the five billion mark by 2019. The level of interaction with technology creates an illusion of understanding. Expert users are not expert technologists.
Many senior leaders don’t claim to be expert technologists but when it comes to technology decisions it has become much easier to have an informed opinion on technology whether for design or desired outcome. This has put a great strain on IT because technology while magical is not magic. It takes hard work, a great deal of thought and planning. Even if agile methodologies are applied, requirements matter.
In this world of 140 characters or less, it is safe to say that some folks reading this blog if uninterested would have disengaged about eight sentences ago. The expectation today is that everything will happen quickly and it will be exactly what was expected or we disengage and find something else. This is one of many reasons that IT is suffering in large companies today. CIO’s are fighting subscription or licensed services for solution delivery. It is true that cloud services and licensed subscription models have great benefit but acquisition of these services still require strategic thinking.
A simple exercise in building a small and usable gaming system will demonstrate end to end implementation of easy to acquire technology and show how important strategic planning and understanding of technology is relative to projects small, medium or large.
Many leaders in industry are walking away from IT and looking to make IT decisions on their own. They can use their own budget and solve their own problem without IT. In some instances where risk is low, they can do this with very little impact. In most cases, they find a need to bring IT in at either the end of the purchase or when they need to actually implement. This creates contention and can impact their ability to get the software or services they wanted in the first place. The underlying question is “Why can’t I do here what I do at home”? Anyone feel free to comment on this .. but the various reasons should be addressed in another blog at some point.
If industry / business leaders want to make decisions in technology, they should become familiar with what it takes to compose and implement solutions. I am not saying they should become IT experts but my contention is leaders should know their desired outcome relative to the environment they are in. An info-graphic on AI can drive me to put Alexa in my home but this is very different from me deploying Alexa in my company. As a leader, I need to understand the differences to make an informed and economically sound and viable decision.
Making it Real
The Raspberry Pi is a small computer that you can purchase for as low as $10.00.
The Raspberry Pi has free open source operating systems that you can download for many uses. One of the operating systems available has software called RetroPi. With RetroPi you can build a system that plays thousands of games from many of the older popular gaming systems.
You can get as fancy as you like depending on your desired result.
or you can keep it simple
Either way, it is learning experience that incorporates some very basic skills using technology to accomplish a relatively simple goal.
Leadership that seeks to use technologies to enable and grow their business should have a tacit understanding of this kind of project.
Some factors to consider here are
- Instructions are readily available both written and video (Build a Pi)
- The operating system is no cost and easy to install
- The software is pre-configured and highly intuitive
- The estimated time to completion is 10 minutes (That’s fast)
Results May Vary
Here we have a simple project that should take 10 minutes to employ. It will result in countless hours of fun and entertainment for the family and for those who enjoy retro games, it will save hundreds of dollars in purchasing a retro console. It meets most of the criteria asked from technology companies and IT today. It has the makings of a perfect simple technology implementation.
Side note, below is my machine that I built..